alpaca: have bottom teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bottom teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(sheep, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(llama, have bottom teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(llama, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(llama, have bottom teeth)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(sheep, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(sheep, has physical part teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(llama, has physical part teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(llama, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(alpaca, have bottom teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(alpaca, has physical part teeth)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has physical part teeth)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(alpaca, has physical part teeth)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alpaca, have bottom teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(sheep, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(llama, has physical part teeth)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have bottom teeth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(llama, have bottom teeth)