alpaca: have long necks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.74
, fiber
Weight: 0.61
, wildlife
Weight: 0.53
, meat
Weight: 0.51
, horse
Weight: 0.50
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.39
, sheep
Weight: 0.36
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.36
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.36
, piglet
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have long necks 1.00
has physical part necks 0.93
have three stomachs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have long necks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(llama, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(llama, have long necks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(llama, have three stomachs)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(llama, have three stomachs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(alpaca, have long necks)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(alpaca, has physical part necks)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(alpaca, has physical part necks)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(alpaca, has physical part necks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, has physical part necks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(alpaca, have three stomachs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(alpaca, have three stomachs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have three stomachs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(alpaca, have three stomachs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alpaca, have long necks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(llama, have long necks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(alpaca, have long necks)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(llama, have three stomachs)