alternator: going bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor
Weight: 0.57
, source
Weight: 0.55
, device
Weight: 0.53
, pulley
Weight: 0.53
, electric motor
Weight: 0.52
Siblings internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.34
, car battery
Weight: 0.33
, brake
Weight: 0.33
, transformer
Weight: 0.33
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
going bad 1.00
go bad 0.92
does go bad 0.89
bad 0.88
keep going 0.85
be when bad 0.85
has quality bad 0.80
feel like better game 0.78
coming back to earth 0.77
go 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(alternator, going bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(car battery, go bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(transformer, coming back to earth)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(car battery, keep going)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(alternator, going bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(car battery, keep going)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(car battery, keep going)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(transformer, coming back to earth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(transformer, coming back to earth)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(car battery, go bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(car battery, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(alternator, going bad)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(alternator, keep going)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(alternator, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(alternator, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(alternator, go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alternator, go)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(alternator, go)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(alternator, go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(alternator, keep going)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(alternator, does go bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(alternator, go)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(alternator, does go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(alternator, does go bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(alternator, keep going)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(alternator, bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alternator, does go bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(alternator, bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(alternator, be when bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(alternator, go)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(alternator, be when bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(alternator, bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(alternator, bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alternator, be when bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alternator, keep going)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(alternator, be when bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(alternator, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(alternator, going bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(car battery, go bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(car battery, keep going)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(transformer, coming back to earth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(alternator, going bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)