alternator: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents motor
Weight: 0.57
, source
Weight: 0.55
, device
Weight: 0.53
, pulley
Weight: 0.53
, electric motor
Weight: 0.52
Siblings internal combustion engine
Weight: 0.34
, car battery
Weight: 0.33
, brake
Weight: 0.33
, transformer
Weight: 0.33
, electric heater
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
bad 0.86
be when bad 0.81
going bad 0.80
go bad 0.79
does go bad 0.78
get bad reviews 0.76
has quality questions 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pulley, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alternator, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(source, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(pulley, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(source, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(pulley, has quality questions)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(car battery, go bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(source, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(pulley, has quality questions)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(car battery, go bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(car battery, go bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(alternator, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(alternator, bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(alternator, bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(alternator, go bad)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(alternator, going bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(alternator, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(alternator, going bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(alternator, go bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(alternator, bad)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(alternator, be when bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(alternator, going bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(alternator, does go bad)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(alternator, does go bad)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(alternator, be when bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alternator, does go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alternator, be when bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(alternator, go bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(alternator, going bad)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(alternator, bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(alternator, does go bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(alternator, be when bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(alternator, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulley, has quality questions)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(car battery, go bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(source, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(alternator, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pulley, has quality questions)