altruism: be problem for evolutionary theory

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents behavior
Weight: 0.68
, virtue
Weight: 0.65
, concept
Weight: 0.62
, trait
Weight: 0.60
, value
Weight: 0.60
Siblings compassion
Weight: 0.36
, kindness
Weight: 0.36
, patriotism
Weight: 0.35
, greed
Weight: 0.35
, generosity
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be problem for evolutionary theory 1.00
be problem for theory 0.90
be initially baffling to evolutionary biologist 0.83
be explainable according to rational choice theory 0.80
be explainable according to choice theory 0.79
be unimportant in process of evolution 0.78
be evolutionarily selected for 0.76
be problem in society 0.76
be evolutionarily selected 0.75
is important biology 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(trait, is important biology)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(trait, is important biology)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(trait, is important biology)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(greed, be problem in society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(trait, is important biology)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(greed, be problem in society)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(greed, be problem in society)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for theory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(altruism, be problem for theory)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for theory)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(altruism, be problem for theory)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(altruism, be initially baffling to evolutionary biologist)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be initially baffling to evolutionary biologist)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(altruism, be initially baffling to evolutionary biologist)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(altruism, be initially baffling to evolutionary biologist)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Salient(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(trait, is important biology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(greed, be problem in society)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(generosity, be evolutionarily selected for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to rational choice theory)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(behavior, be explainable according to choice theory)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(trait, be unimportant in process of evolution)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(altruism, be problem for evolutionary theory)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(trait, is important biology)