aluminium: be better than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.49
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.28
, copper
Weight: 0.28
, gold
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than iron 1.00
more than iron 0.96
make than iron 0.95
be more reactive than iron 0.90
be preferred to iron 0.86
be above iron 0.86
be better than steel for car bodies 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(aluminium, be better than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(aluminium, make than iron)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(aluminium, make than iron)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(aluminium, more than iron)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(aluminium, more than iron)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(aluminium, more than iron)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(aluminium, be more reactive than iron)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, more than iron)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(aluminium, be better than steel for car bodies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be better than steel for car bodies)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, make than iron)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aluminium, make than iron)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be better than steel for car bodies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more reactive than iron)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be preferred to iron)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aluminium, be preferred to iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(aluminium, be better than steel for car bodies)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be preferred to iron)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aluminium, be preferred to iron)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be better than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aluminium, be better than iron)