aluminium: be good conductor of electricity

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.49
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.28
, copper
Weight: 0.28
, gold
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good conductor of electricity 1.00
be good conductor of heat 0.90
have employed for electricity transmission wires 0.80
making electric wires 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(gold, be good conductor of electricity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(copper, be good conductor of heat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(gold, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(gold, be good conductor of electricity)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(aluminum, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(copper, be good conductor of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(copper, be good conductor of heat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(aluminium, be good conductor of heat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good conductor of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of heat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(gold, be good conductor of electricity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of electricity)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good conductor of heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good conductor of electricity) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(copper, be good conductor of heat)