aluminium: be good metal use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.49
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.28
, copper
Weight: 0.28
, gold
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good metal use 1.00
is important metal 0.92
be metal 0.92
is metal 0.92
be good metal for stick 0.92
be considered important metal 0.90
be considered metal 0.90
is expensive metal 0.90
be good metal for non stick 0.89
be used although metal 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(gold, is metal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(copper, is metal)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(copper, be considered metal)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be considered metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(aluminum, is metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(aluminum, be considered metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be considered metal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(copper, is metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(copper, is metal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(gold, is metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(gold, is metal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(copper, be considered metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(copper, be considered metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(aluminium, be good metal use)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(aluminium, is metal)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(aluminium, is metal)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(aluminium, is metal)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(aluminium, be considered metal)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, is metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, is expensive metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be considered metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(aluminium, is expensive metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(aluminium, be considered metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(aluminium, be used although metal)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(aluminium, be used although metal)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be used although metal)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be used although metal)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(aluminium, is expensive metal)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(aluminium, is expensive metal)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be considered metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good metal use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(aluminum, is metal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(aluminum, be considered metal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(copper, is metal)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(gold, is metal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(copper, be considered metal)