aluminium: be more durable than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.49
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.28
, copper
Weight: 0.28
, gold
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more durable than iron 1.00
be more expensive than steel 0.82
be used more than steel 0.81
be better than steel 0.80
be lighter than steel 0.79
be used more than magnesium 0.78
be more reactive than copper 0.77
be better choice use in alloy 0.76
be good metal use 0.76
is expensive metal 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be better than steel)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(aluminum, be better than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(aluminum, be more expensive than steel) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(aluminium, be used more than steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(aluminium, be more expensive than steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(aluminium, be lighter than steel)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(aluminium, be used more than magnesium)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(aluminium, be used more than magnesium)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(aluminium, be good metal use)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(aluminium, be used more than steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more expensive than steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be lighter than steel)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be used more than magnesium)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(aluminium, is expensive metal)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be used more than steel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(aluminium, be better than steel)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, is expensive metal)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be good metal use)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be good metal use)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be lighter than steel)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be more expensive than steel)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(aluminium, is expensive metal)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(aluminium, be good metal use)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be better than steel)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be better than steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(aluminium, be better than steel)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be used more than magnesium)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more expensive than steel)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(aluminium, be lighter than steel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be used more than steel)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(aluminium, is expensive metal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more durable than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(aluminum, be better than steel)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more durable than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(aluminum, be more expensive than steel)