aluminium: be more reactive than iron

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.55
, material
Weight: 0.54
, ingredient
Weight: 0.53
, thing
Weight: 0.50
, product
Weight: 0.49
Siblings raw material
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum
Weight: 0.28
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.28
, copper
Weight: 0.28
, gold
Weight: 0.28

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more reactive than iron 1.00
more than iron 0.92
be better than iron 0.90
make than iron 0.88
is reactive 0.87
be preferred to iron 0.80
be above iron 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(copper, is reactive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(copper, is reactive) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(copper, is reactive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(aluminium, be more reactive than iron)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(aluminium, make than iron)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(aluminium, more than iron)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(aluminium, make than iron)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(aluminium, more than iron)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(aluminium, more than iron)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be better than iron)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(aluminium, be better than iron)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, more than iron)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be better than iron)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(aluminium, be better than iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, make than iron)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(aluminium, make than iron)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be preferred to iron)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(aluminium, be preferred to iron)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(aluminium, be preferred to iron)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(aluminium, be preferred to iron)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aluminium, be more reactive than iron)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(aluminium, be more reactive than iron) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(copper, is reactive)