aluminum: be good choice of metal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.78
, heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
Siblings aluminum chloride
Weight: 0.66
, titanium
Weight: 0.64
, hafnium
Weight: 0.43
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good choice of metal 1.00
be good metal use 0.89
is good metal 0.89
be important as metal 0.85
is important metal 0.85
be considered metal 0.84
is metal 0.83
be preferred to steel 0.78
be good metals to alloy 0.78
be used instead of steel 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(titanium, is metal)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(steel, is metal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(steel, is metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(steel, is metal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(titanium, is metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(titanium, is metal)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(aluminum, is metal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(aluminum, be considered metal)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(aluminum, is metal)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(aluminum, is metal)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be considered metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, is metal)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(aluminum, be important as metal)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(aluminum, be considered metal)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be important as metal)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(aluminum, be used instead of steel)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be important as metal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(aluminum, be important as metal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be considered metal)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(aluminum, be preferred to steel)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be used instead of steel)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(aluminum, be good choice of metal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(steel, is metal)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be good choice of metal) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(titanium, is metal)