aluminum: be valuable to waste

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents heavy metal
Weight: 0.72
, metal
Weight: 0.67
, raw material
Weight: 0.66
, chemical
Weight: 0.64
, mineral
Weight: 0.61
Siblings titanium
Weight: 0.64
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.39
, steel
Weight: 0.38
, copper
Weight: 0.37
, magnesium
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be valuable to waste 1.00
be valuable as recyclable 0.85
be consider valuable if they be rare 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(metal, be consider valuable if they be rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aluminum, be valuable to waste)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(metal, be consider valuable if they be rare)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(metal, be consider valuable if they be rare)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(metal, be consider valuable if they be rare) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be valuable to waste)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(aluminum, be valuable to waste)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(aluminum, be valuable as recyclable)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be valuable to waste)

Typical implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(aluminum, be valuable to waste)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(metal, be consider valuable if they be rare)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(aluminum, be valuable to waste) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(metal, be consider valuable if they be rare)