amendment: is more common

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents proposal
Weight: 0.73
, revision
Weight: 0.69
, provision
Weight: 0.68
, clause
Weight: 0.65
, rule
Weight: 0.64
Siblings plan
Weight: 0.69
, bill
Weight: 0.40
, legislation
Weight: 0.39
, measure
Weight: 0.37
, resolution
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is more common 1.00
is common 0.95
be 3 case of common sense 0.81
is used more 0.77
is more expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, is more common)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(revision, is more expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(revision, is more expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(revision, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(amendment, is more common)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(amendment, is more common)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(amendment, is used more)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is used more)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(amendment, is used more)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(amendment, is used more)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is more common)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(amendment, is more common)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(amendment, is more common)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(revision, is more expensive)