american english: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents english language
Weight: 0.74
, language
Weight: 0.65
, french
Weight: 0.64
, accent
Weight: 0.59
, dialect
Weight: 0.53
Siblings old english
Weight: 0.40
, american sign language
Weight: 0.39
, chinese language
Weight: 0.38
, english
Weight: 0.38
, italian language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality good 0.85
has quality better 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(english language, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(american english, has quality wrong)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dialect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(american english, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(dialect, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(english language, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(english language, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(dialect, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(english language, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(dialect, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(american english, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(american english, has quality good)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(american english, has quality better)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(american english, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(american english, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(american english, has quality better)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(american english, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality better)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(american english, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dialect, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(dialect, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(american english, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(english language, has quality good)