american football: be unpopular in parts

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents football
Weight: 0.70
, game
Weight: 0.69
, sport
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.64
Siblings rugby ball
Weight: 0.63
, football game
Weight: 0.39
, football team
Weight: 0.38
, football field
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be unpopular in parts 1.00
be unpopular in other parts 0.98
be unpopular in parts of world 0.97
be unpopular in other parts of world 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(american football, be unpopular in parts)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(american football, be unpopular in other parts)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(american football, be unpopular in other parts)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(american football, be unpopular in parts of world)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(american football, be unpopular in other parts of world)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(american football, be unpopular in other parts of world)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(american football, be unpopular in parts of world)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(american football, be unpopular in parts of world)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(american football, be unpopular in parts of world)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(american football, be unpopular in other parts of world)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(american football, be unpopular in other parts)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(american football, be unpopular in other parts of world)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(american football, be unpopular in other parts)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(american football, be unpopular in parts)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(american football, be unpopular in parts)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(american football, be unpopular in parts)