amide: is functional group

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents functional group
Weight: 0.66
, group
Weight: 0.60
, linkage
Weight: 0.59
, substance
Weight: 0.55
Siblings amino acid
Weight: 0.36
, amine
Weight: 0.35
, sodium hydroxide
Weight: 0.35
, ammonium sulfate
Weight: 0.34
, methyl
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is functional group 1.00
is group 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(methyl, is functional group)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(methyl, is group)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(amine, is group)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(methyl, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(methyl, is functional group)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(amine, is group)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(amine, is group)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(methyl, is group)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(methyl, is group)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(amide, is functional group)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(amide, is group)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(amide, is group)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(amide, is group)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(amide, is group)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(amide, is functional group)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(amide, is functional group)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(methyl, is functional group)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(methyl, is group)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(amide, is functional group)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(amine, is group)