amount: be in blood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents value
Weight: 0.64
, cost
Weight: 0.62
, variable
Weight: 0.62
, factor
Weight: 0.62
Siblings increase
Weight: 0.66
, price
Weight: 0.66
, allowance
Weight: 0.63
, balance
Weight: 0.61
, rent
Weight: 0.61

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in blood 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(amount, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(increase, be in blood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(amount, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(increase, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(increase, be in blood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(amount, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(amount, be in blood)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(amount, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amount, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(amount, be in blood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(amount, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(amount, be in blood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(amount, be in blood)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(increase, be in blood)