amphibian: be called amphibians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called amphibians 1.00
is amphibians 0.99
were different from amphibians 0.95
were different from modern amphibians 0.91
be related to reptiles 0.80
is invertebrates 0.79
be different from reptiles 0.79
be classified as vertebrates 0.77
is vertebrates 0.77
be vertebrates 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be different from reptiles)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(amphibian, is vertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is vertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is vertebrates)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(amphibian, is vertebrates)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be vertebrates)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(amphibian, be different from reptiles)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be different from reptiles)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(amphibian, be different from reptiles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibians)