amphibian: be considered unique evolutionary group

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered unique evolutionary group 1.00
be considered evolutionary group 0.97
be considered unique group 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(amphibian, be considered evolutionary group)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(amphibian, be considered evolutionary group)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be considered evolutionary group)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(amphibian, be considered unique group)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.97
Typical(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(amphibian, be considered unique group)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be considered unique group)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be considered evolutionary group)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be considered unique group)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(amphibian, be considered unique evolutionary group)