amphibian: be good indicators of ecological health

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good indicators of ecological health 1.00
is ecological indicators 0.97
be called ecological indicators 0.97
be good indicators of health 0.94
is ecological indicator 0.91
is effective ecological indicator 0.89
is good biological indicators 0.89
is good indicators 0.89
is biological indicators 0.87
be considered biological indicators 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(amphibian, be good indicators of health)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be good indicators of health)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be good indicators of health)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(amphibian, be good indicators of health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(amphibian, be good indicators of ecological health)