amphibian: has physical part limbs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part limbs 1.00
has physical part skin 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(amphibian, has physical part limbs)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part limbs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part limbs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part limbs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)