amphibian: have moist skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have moist skin 1.00
is skin moist 1.00
need moist skin 0.99
live in moist environment 0.90
live in moist areas 0.89
have wet skin 0.89
need moist habitat 0.87
need skin 0.83
moisture 0.82
breathe through skin 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(frog, have moist skin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have moist skin)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(frog, need skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(lizard, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lizard, have moist skin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(frog, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(frog, have moist skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(frog, need skin)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(frog, need skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, need skin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(amphibian, live in moist areas)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(amphibian, live in moist areas)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(amphibian, live in moist areas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(amphibian, need skin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(amphibian, need skin)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, live in moist areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, need skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lizard, have moist skin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(frog, need skin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(frog, have moist skin)