amphibian: have wet skin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
have wet skin 1.00
have moist skin 0.89
is skin moist 0.88
need moist skin 0.88
need skin 0.86
has physical part skin 0.83
breathe through skin 0.82
live in wet areas 0.81
differ in skin 0.79
live in wet environments 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(frog, have moist skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(lizard, have moist skin)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(frog, need skin)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(frog, need skin)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(frog, need skin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(lizard, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(lizard, have moist skin)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(frog, have moist skin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(frog, have moist skin)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(turtle, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(frog, has physical part skin)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(frog, has physical part skin)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(amphibian, differ in skin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, need skin)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(amphibian, differ in skin)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, has physical part skin)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(amphibian, need skin)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(amphibian, have moist skin)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(amphibian, differ in skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(amphibian, have moist skin)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, breathe through skin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have moist skin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(amphibian, need skin)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, is skin moist)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(amphibian, have moist skin)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, need moist skin)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, need skin)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, differ in skin)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(amphibian, have wet skin)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(turtle, has physical part skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(frog, need skin)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lizard, have moist skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(frog, has physical part skin)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, have wet skin)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(frog, have moist skin)