amphibian: were different from amphibians

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents vertebrate
Weight: 0.65
, animal
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.62
, creature
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.56
Siblings tree frog
Weight: 0.77
, newt
Weight: 0.66
, turtle
Weight: 0.66
, frog
Weight: 0.64
, lizard
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
were different from amphibians 1.00
were different from modern amphibians 0.96
is amphibians 0.95
be called amphibians 0.95
be different from reptiles 0.84
be different from other vertebrates 0.82
be different from birds 0.82
be different from other animals 0.82
be different from animals 0.81
be different from other other classes of vertebrates 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(vertebrate, be different from animals)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(vertebrate, be different from other animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(vertebrate, be different from animals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(vertebrate, be different from other animals)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(vertebrate, be different from animals)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(frog, is amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(frog, is amphibians)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(frog, be called amphibians)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(frog, be called amphibians)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(amphibian, were different from amphibians)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be called amphibians)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be different from reptiles)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(amphibian, be called amphibians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(amphibian, be called amphibians)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, be different from animals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be called amphibians)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(amphibian, be different from reptiles)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(amphibian, be different from animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be different from animals)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(amphibian, be different from reptiles)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(amphibian, be different from animals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(amphibian, be different from reptiles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from other animals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(frog, is amphibians)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(frog, be called amphibians)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from animals)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(amphibian, were different from amphibians)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(vertebrate, be different from other animals)