amplifier: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musical instrument
Weight: 0.64
, optical fiber
Weight: 0.64
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, audio
Weight: 0.60
Siblings antenna
Weight: 0.59
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.36
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, acoustic guitar
Weight: 0.35
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is quality 0.91
be quality 0.90
has quality worth 0.85
has quality service 0.81
has quality price 0.80
has quality effect 0.78
has quality questions 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, be quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(optical fiber, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(optical fiber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, is quality)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(audio, be quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(audio, has quality service)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is quality)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality questions)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audio, be quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(audio, has quality service)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(diode, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(diode, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(antenna, has quality effect)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, be quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(optical fiber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(optical fiber, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(optical fiber, has quality questions) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(diode, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diode, has quality bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, is quality)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(diode, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diode, is quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(antenna, has quality effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(antenna, has quality effect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(amplifier, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is quality)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(audio, be quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(audio, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(antenna, has quality effect)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diode, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diode, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, has quality price)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(audio, be quality)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(audio, has quality service)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(amplifier, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality questions)