amplifier: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents musical instrument
Weight: 0.64
, optical fiber
Weight: 0.64
, electronic device
Weight: 0.61
, equipment
Weight: 0.60
, audio
Weight: 0.60
Siblings antenna
Weight: 0.59
, percussion instrument
Weight: 0.36
, diode
Weight: 0.35
, acoustic guitar
Weight: 0.35
, brass instrument
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
has quality good 0.85
is quality 0.83
has quality better 0.83
be quality 0.82
has quality bad 0.82
has quality price 0.81
is value 0.79
has quality service 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, be quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(optical fiber, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(optical fiber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(optical fiber, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(electronic device, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(audio, be quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(audio, has quality service)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(optical fiber, is quality)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(audio, be quality)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(audio, has quality service)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(diode, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(diode, is quality)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is value)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(brass instrument, is quality)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(musical instrument, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(electronic device, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, be quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(optical fiber, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(optical fiber, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(audio, has quality service) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(brass instrument, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, is quality)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(brass instrument, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(diode, is quality) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(diode, is quality)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(diode, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(diode, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, has quality price) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(acoustic guitar, is value) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(acoustic guitar, is value)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(amplifier, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(amplifier, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(amplifier, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(amplifier, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is quality)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(audio, be quality)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(audio, has quality service)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(diode, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, is quality)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(brass instrument, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, has quality price)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(diode, is quality)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(acoustic guitar, is value)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(optical fiber, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(optical fiber, is quality)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(electronic device, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(musical instrument, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(audio, be quality)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(amplifier, has quality worth) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(audio, has quality service)