amsterdam: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents london
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
, los angeles
Weight: 0.58
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
be expensive in may 0.87
is cheap 0.79
is new cheap 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(london, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(london, is expensive)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(city, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(los angeles, is expensive)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(london, is expensive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(city, is expensive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(switzerland, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(london, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(los angeles, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(las vegas, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(switzerland, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(switzerland, is expensive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(quebec city, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(quebec city, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(las vegas, is cheap)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(las vegas, is cheap)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is expensive)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(amsterdam, be expensive in may)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(amsterdam, be expensive in may)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, be expensive in may)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, be expensive in may)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is new cheap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is new cheap)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is new cheap)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is cheap)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is new cheap)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(amsterdam, is cheap)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, is cheap)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is cheap)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(london, is expensive)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(las vegas, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(switzerland, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(quebec city, is expensive)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(las vegas, is cheap)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(los angeles, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(london, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(amsterdam, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(city, is expensive)