amsterdam: was built

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents london
Weight: 0.60
, city
Weight: 0.59
, location
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.58
, los angeles
Weight: 0.58
Siblings las vegas
Weight: 0.35
, quebec city
Weight: 0.34
, venice
Weight: 0.34
, switzerland
Weight: 0.34
, mexico city
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
was built 1.00
be built on canals 0.77
was new founded 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(venice, was built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(venice, be built on canals)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(venice, was built)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(venice, was built)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(venice, be built on canals)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(venice, be built on canals)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was built)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(amsterdam, be built on canals)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was new founded)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was new founded)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(amsterdam, was new founded)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(amsterdam, was new founded)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was built)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(amsterdam, was built)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(venice, was built)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(amsterdam, was built)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(venice, be built on canals)