anaconda: adapt to amazon river

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.65
, snake
Weight: 0.65
, company
Weight: 0.52
, film
Weight: 0.51
Siblings boa constrictor
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.37
, python
Weight: 0.36
, crocodile
Weight: 0.36
, reptile
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
adapt to amazon river 1.00
live in amazon rainforest 0.82
adapt to rainforest 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(lizard, adapt to rainforest) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(lizard, adapt to rainforest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(anaconda, adapt to amazon river)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(anaconda, live in amazon rainforest)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, live in amazon rainforest)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(anaconda, adapt to rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(anaconda, live in amazon rainforest)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(anaconda, live in amazon rainforest)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, adapt to rainforest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(anaconda, adapt to rainforest)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(anaconda, adapt to rainforest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, adapt to amazon river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(anaconda, adapt to amazon river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, adapt to amazon river) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(lizard, adapt to rainforest)