:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(python, mate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, mate)
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(python, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(python, mate)
Salient implies Plausible
0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(anaconda, mate)
Similarity expansion
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, kill mate)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, eat mates)
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(anaconda, mate)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(python, mate)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(anaconda, mate)
⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(crocodile, mate)