analysis: be important in science class

Related concepts

Parents	factor Weight: 0.62 , risk Weight: 0.59 , journal Weight: 0.59 , projection Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cost benefit analysis Weight: 0.76 , report Weight: 0.67 , review Weight: 0.60 , insight Weight: 0.59 , reporting Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important in science class	1.00
be important in science	0.93
be important in math	0.82
be important for students	0.79
be important in geography	0.78
be related in math	0.78
be crucial to scientific process	0.76
be important in research	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(journal, be important for students) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(journal, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(projection, be important in geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(factor, be important in math)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(journal, be important for students)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(projection, be important in geography)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(factor, be related in math)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(journal, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(factor, be important in math)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Remarkable(factor, be related in math)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(journal, be important for students)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Remarkable(projection, be important in geography)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(journal, be important in research)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to scientific process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.87

Plausible(factor, be important in math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science class)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.86

Plausible(journal, be important for students) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science class)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(journal, be important in research) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science class)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Plausible(factor, be related in math) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science class)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(projection, be important in geography) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science class)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

Remarkable(reporting, be crucial to scientific process) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(reporting, be crucial to scientific process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in science class)

Similarity expansion

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science)

0.77

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Salient(analysis, be important in science)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(analysis, be important in science)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.58

Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Salient(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(analysis, be important in science class)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(projection, be important in geography)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(journal, be important for students)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(journal, be important in research)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(reporting, be crucial to scientific process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(factor, be important in math)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(journal, be important for students)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(projection, be important in geography)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(factor, be related in math)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(analysis, be important in science class) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Typical(journal, be important in research)