analyst: cover banks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents expert
Weight: 0.76
, third party
Weight: 0.55
, employee
Weight: 0.55
, researcher
Weight: 0.54
Siblings economist
Weight: 0.37
, scientist
Weight: 0.36
, professor
Weight: 0.36
, scholar
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
cover banks 1.00
cover other banks 0.99

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(analyst, cover banks)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(analyst, cover other banks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(analyst, cover other banks)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(analyst, cover other banks)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(analyst, cover other banks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(analyst, cover banks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(analyst, cover banks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(analyst, cover banks)