andrew: be ng stanford machine learning

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents name
Weight: 0.59
, man
Weight: 0.57
, star
Weight: 0.54
, guest
Weight: 0.52
, child
Weight: 0.51
Siblings albert einstein
Weight: 0.35
, michael jackson
Weight: 0.35
, adam smith
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be ng stanford machine learning 1.00
be ng stanford machine 0.98
be famous ng 0.87
is rt davies 0.76
is stewart guerra 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(andrew, be ng stanford machine)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(andrew, is stewart guerra)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(andrew, is rt davies)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(andrew, be ng stanford machine)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(andrew, is rt davies)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(andrew, be ng stanford machine)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(andrew, is stewart guerra)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(andrew, be ng stanford machine)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(andrew, is rt davies)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(andrew, be famous ng)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(andrew, is stewart guerra)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(andrew, be famous ng)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(andrew, be famous ng)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(andrew, be famous ng)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(andrew, is rt davies)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(andrew, is stewart guerra)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(andrew, be ng stanford machine learning)