android: be more popular than ios in usa

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents linux
Weight: 0.67
, cell phone
Weight: 0.64
, smartphone
Weight: 0.64
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.63
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.36
, samsung
Weight: 0.35
, nokia
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.35
, motorola
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than ios in usa 1.00
be more popular than ios 0.93
be than ios in 2014 0.92
be than ios 0.91
be better than ios 0.89
be than better ios 0.89
be less battery-efficient than ios 0.89
be much better than ios 0.88
be more popular than iphone 0.88
be better than apple ios 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(android, be more popular than ios in usa)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(android, be than ios in 2014)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(android, be more popular than ios)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(android, be than ios in 2014)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(android, be than ios in 2014)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than ios)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(android, be more popular than ios)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than ios)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(android, be than ios in 2014)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than ios in usa)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than ios in usa)