android: be more popular than iphone

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents linux
Weight: 0.67
, cell phone
Weight: 0.64
, smartphone
Weight: 0.64
, mobile phone
Weight: 0.63
, software
Weight: 0.63
Siblings iphone
Weight: 0.36
, samsung
Weight: 0.35
, nokia
Weight: 0.35
, ipad
Weight: 0.35
, motorola
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more popular than iphone 1.00
be better than iphone 2018 0.95
be better than iphone 0.95
be cheaper than iphone 0.93
is better iphone 0.93
be worse than iphone 0.92
is better then iphone 0.91
be more popular than ios 0.90
be more popular than ios in usa 0.88
be better than iphones 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphone)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(samsung, be better than iphones)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(samsung, be better than iphones)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(android, be better than iphone)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(android, be better than iphone 2018)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(android, be better than iphone)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(android, be worse than iphone)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(android, be better than iphone 2018)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(android, be better than iphone)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(android, be better than iphone 2018)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(android, be more popular than ios)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(android, be worse than iphone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(android, be worse than iphone)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(android, be worse than iphone)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(android, be better than iphones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(android, be better than iphones)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than ios)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(android, be more popular than ios)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(android, be better than iphones)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(android, be cheaper than iphone)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than ios)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(android, be better than iphone 2018)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(android, be better than iphone)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than ios in usa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(android, be better than iphones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(android, be more popular than iphone)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(samsung, be cheaper than iphone)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphone)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(samsung, be better than iphones)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(android, be more popular than iphone)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ipad, be cheaper than iphone)