anemia: be common in patients receiving

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sickle cell anemia
Weight: 0.80
, symptom
Weight: 0.65
, complication
Weight: 0.65
, abnormality
Weight: 0.64
, condition
Weight: 0.60
Siblings hemolytic anemia
Weight: 0.83
, thalassemia
Weight: 0.50
, liver cancer
Weight: 0.36
, pulmonary edema
Weight: 0.36
, hypertension
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be common in patients receiving 1.00
be common in patients with scd 0.91
be common in patients 0.91
develop in patients 0.84
be most common in individuals 0.77
develop in patients with leukemia 0.77
be more common in elderly 0.77
be common in elderly 0.76
be most common in black individuals 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be most common in black individuals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be most common in black individuals)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be most common in black individuals)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(hypertension, be more common in elderly)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(hypertension, be common in elderly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be most common in black individuals)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(hypertension, be common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(hypertension, be common in elderly)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(hypertension, be more common in elderly)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(hypertension, be more common in elderly)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(anemia, be common in patients receiving)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(anemia, be common in patients)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(anemia, be common in patients with scd)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(anemia, be common in patients)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(anemia, develop in patients)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(anemia, be common in patients)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(anemia, be common in patients with scd)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(anemia, be common in patients with scd)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(anemia, develop in patients)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(anemia, develop in patients)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(anemia, develop in patients with leukemia)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients with scd)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(anemia, develop in patients)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(anemia, develop in patients with leukemia)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(anemia, develop in patients with leukemia)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(anemia, develop in patients with leukemia)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be most common in black individuals)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(hypertension, be common in elderly)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(hypertension, be more common in elderly)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be most common in individuals)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(anemia, be common in patients receiving)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(sickle cell anemia, be most common in black individuals)