anesthesia: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents surgical procedure
Weight: 0.62
, treatment
Weight: 0.61
, service
Weight: 0.58
, medication
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.55
Siblings plastic surgery
Weight: 0.36
, hysterectomy
Weight: 0.35
, anesthetic
Weight: 0.35
, tonsillectomy
Weight: 0.35
, sedative
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
be bad in bulgaria 0.87
is quality problems 0.80
have suck bad 0.77
be in bad weather 0.76
feel good 0.76
is good thing 0.75
has quality jokes 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medication, is quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(medication, is quality problems)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(service, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(service, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medication, is quality)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(medication, is quality problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(service, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medication, is quality)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(service, is quality)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(medication, is quality problems)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(service, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medication, is quality)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(service, is quality)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(medication, is quality problems)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(plastic surgery, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic surgery, is good thing)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(anesthesia, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(anesthesia, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(anesthesia, feel good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(anesthesia, feel good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, feel good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(medication, is quality problems)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(medication, is quality)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(hysterectomy, has quality jokes)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic surgery, is good thing)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(service, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(service, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(medication, is quality)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(anesthesia, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(medication, is quality problems)