angel: need wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.67
, family
Weight: 0.60
, television show
Weight: 0.60
, word
Weight: 0.59
, song
Weight: 0.59
Siblings komodo dragon
Weight: 0.35
, fairy
Weight: 0.35
, unicorn
Weight: 0.35
, devil
Weight: 0.35
, mermaid
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
need wings 1.00
lose wings 0.90
has physical part wings 0.89
have 6 wings 0.89
have fire wings 0.88
be shown with wings 0.86
be represented with wings 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(fairy, has physical part wings)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(unicorn, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(unicorn, has physical part wings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(fairy, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(fairy, has physical part wings)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(angel, need wings)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(angel, lose wings)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(angel, lose wings)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(angel, lose wings)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(angel, have fire wings)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(angel, have fire wings)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(angel, have fire wings)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(angel, have fire wings)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(angel, be shown with wings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(angel, has physical part wings)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(angel, has physical part wings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(angel, has physical part wings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(angel, be represented with wings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(angel, be shown with wings)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(angel, lose wings)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(angel, has physical part wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(angel, be represented with wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(angel, be represented with wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(angel, be shown with wings)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(angel, be represented with wings)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(angel, be shown with wings)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(angel, need wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(angel, need wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(unicorn, has physical part wings)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(angel, need wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(fairy, has physical part wings)