angelica: is hale fans nasty

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents herb
Weight: 0.73
, plant
Weight: 0.49
, flower
Weight: 0.47
, angel
Weight: 0.39
Siblings aloe vera
Weight: 0.39
, valerian
Weight: 0.38
, anise
Weight: 0.38
, hyssop
Weight: 0.38
, caraway
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is hale fans nasty 1.00
is hale fans nasty on internet 0.97
is hale fans 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(angelica, is hale fans nasty)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(angelica, is hale fans nasty on internet)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(angelica, is hale fans nasty on internet)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(angelica, is hale fans)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(angelica, is hale fans nasty on internet)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(angelica, is hale fans)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(angelica, is hale fans nasty on internet)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Typical(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(angelica, is hale fans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(angelica, is hale fans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Salient(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(angelica, is hale fans nasty)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(angelica, is hale fans nasty)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(angelica, is hale fans nasty)