anger: be good management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.64
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, sin
Weight: 0.63
, joy
Weight: 0.63
, desire
Weight: 0.63
Siblings frustration
Weight: 0.37
, anxiety
Weight: 0.36
, hostility
Weight: 0.36
, hatred
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good management 1.00
is management 0.95
be used as management skill 0.84
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(emotion, be used as management skill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(anger, be good management)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(desire, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(anger, be good management)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(anger, be good management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(emotion, be used as management skill)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(emotion, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(desire, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(emotion, be used as management skill)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(emotion, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(desire, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(frustration, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(hatred, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(emotion, be used as management skill) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(anger, be good management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(desire, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(anger, be good management)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(emotion, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(anger, be good management)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(frustration, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(frustration, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(hatred, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(hatred, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(anger, be good management)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anger, is management)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(anger, is management)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(anger, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(anger, has quality good)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(anger, is management)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(anger, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(anger, is management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Salient(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.00
Plausible(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(anger, be good management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(emotion, be used as management skill)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(desire, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(frustration, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(hatred, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(emotion, be used as management skill)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(desire, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(anger, be good management) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(emotion, has quality good)