anger: be portrayed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.64
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, sin
Weight: 0.63
, joy
Weight: 0.63
, desire
Weight: 0.63
Siblings frustration
Weight: 0.37
, anxiety
Weight: 0.36
, hostility
Weight: 0.36
, hatred
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be portrayed 1.00
be portrayed in of mice 0.80
be described 0.80
be viewed in zoroasterianism 0.78
is perceived 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(hatred, is perceived)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(hatred, is perceived)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(hatred, is perceived)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(anger, be portrayed)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(anger, be portrayed in of mice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(anger, be portrayed in of mice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(anger, be viewed in zoroasterianism)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(anger, be viewed in zoroasterianism)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(anger, be viewed in zoroasterianism)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(anger, be portrayed in of mice)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(anger, be viewed in zoroasterianism)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(anger, be portrayed in of mice)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(anger, be portrayed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(anger, be portrayed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(anger, be portrayed)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(hatred, is perceived)