anger: is management

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents reaction
Weight: 0.64
, emotion
Weight: 0.64
, sin
Weight: 0.63
, joy
Weight: 0.63
, desire
Weight: 0.63
Siblings frustration
Weight: 0.37
, anxiety
Weight: 0.36
, hostility
Weight: 0.36
, hatred
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is management 1.00
be good management 0.95
be used as management skill 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(emotion, be used as management skill)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(anger, is management)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(emotion, be used as management skill)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(emotion, be used as management skill)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(emotion, be used as management skill)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(anger, is management)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(anger, is management)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(anger, be good management)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Salient(anger, be good management)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(anger, be good management)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(anger, be good management)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anger, is management)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(anger, is management)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(emotion, be used as management skill)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(anger, is management)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(emotion, be used as management skill)