animal: be at in forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at in forest 1.00
be at forest 0.99
be find in forest 0.96
be at woodland 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mammal, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.53
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(mammal, be at forest)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(cougar, be at forest)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(mammal, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(cougar, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(cougar, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(animal, be at in forest)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(animal, be at woodland)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Salient(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(cougar, be at forest)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(mammal, be at forest)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)