animal: be used to kill for food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.68
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, victim
Weight: 0.59
, asset
Weight: 0.59
Siblings llama
Weight: 0.77
, mountain goat
Weight: 0.75
, cougar
Weight: 0.75
, prairie dog
Weight: 0.75
, badger
Weight: 0.74

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to kill for food 1.00
kill person 0.88
be used to food 0.84
hunt for food 0.80
eat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to kill for food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creature, eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(badger, eat)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(llama, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(badger, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(badger, eat)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(llama, eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(llama, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(animal, be used to kill for food)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be used to food)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(animal, eat)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, eat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(animal, be used to food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to kill for food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(badger, eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(llama, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(animal, be used to kill for food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)