animation: be used in advertising

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used in advertising 1.00
be important in advertising 0.96
be important for advertising 0.96
have ads 0.86
be important in marketing 0.79
have adverts 0.77
be in print media 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important for advertising)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(animation, be used in advertising)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(animation, be used in advertising)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(design, be important for advertising)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(design, be important in marketing)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(design, be important for advertising)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(design, be important in marketing)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(photography, be important in advertising)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(editing, be in print media)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have ads)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(cinema, have adverts)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(design, be important for advertising)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(design, be important in marketing)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(cinema, have ads)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(cinema, have ads)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(cinema, have adverts)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(cinema, have adverts)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(photography, be important in advertising)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(photography, be important in advertising)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(editing, be in print media)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(editing, be in print media)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(animation, be used in advertising)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(animation, be important in advertising)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(animation, be important in advertising)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(animation, be important in advertising)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, be important in advertising)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(animation, be used in advertising)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important for advertising)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cinema, have adverts)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cinema, have ads)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(editing, be in print media)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(photography, be important in advertising)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(design, be important for advertising)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(animation, be used in advertising)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(design, be important in marketing)