animation: get worse

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get worse 1.00
be better than colour 0.84
is bad now 0.78
think bad 0.78
is horrible 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(animation, get worse)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(design, think bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photography, be better than colour)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(animation, get worse)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photography, be better than colour)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(photography, be better than colour)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(animation, get worse)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(animation, is bad now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(animation, is bad now)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(animation, is bad now)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(animation, is bad now)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(animation, is horrible)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(animation, is horrible)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(animation, is horrible)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(animation, is horrible)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(animation, get worse)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(animation, get worse)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(design, think bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(photography, be better than colour)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(animation, get worse)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(design, think bad)