animation: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
is quality 0.87
is bad now 0.84
has quality standard 0.81
has quality joke 0.80
think bad 0.79
has quality compare 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(design, think bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(medium, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(design, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(design, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(medium, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(design, think bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(industry, has quality standard)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cinema, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(shrek, has quality joke)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(editing, has quality compare)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(design, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(medium, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(medium, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(industry, has quality standard)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(design, think bad)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(shrek, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(shrek, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cinema, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(cinema, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(photography, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(editing, has quality compare)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(editing, has quality compare)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(shrek, has quality joke)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(shrek, has quality joke)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(animation, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(animation, is bad now)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(animation, is bad now)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(animation, is bad now)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(animation, is bad now)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(animation, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(animation, is quality)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(animation, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(animation, is quality)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(animation, is quality)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(animation, has quality good)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(animation, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(animation, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(design, think bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cinema, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photography, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(editing, has quality compare)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(shrek, has quality joke)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(medium, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(medium, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(design, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(industry, has quality standard)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(animation, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(design, think bad)