animation: is expensive

Related concepts

Parents	feature Weight: 0.61 , medium Weight: 0.60 , industry Weight: 0.58 , design Weight: 0.57
Siblings	shrek Weight: 0.62 , photography Weight: 0.33 , cinema Weight: 0.33 , editing Weight: 0.33 , comic Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is expensive	1.00
is damn expensive	0.84
be expensive in india	0.77
is attractive	0.76
be expensive in london	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(design, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(medium, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(feature, is attractive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Plausible(medium, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(design, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(design, be expensive in india)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(feature, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(medium, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(design, is expensive)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(feature, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(photography, is expensive)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Remarkable(cinema, is expensive)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(cinema, be expensive in london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.93

Plausible(design, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Plausible(medium, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(feature, is attractive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(design, be expensive in india) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

Remarkable(cinema, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Plausible(cinema, is expensive)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

Remarkable(photography, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(photography, is expensive)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(cinema, be expensive in london) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Plausible(cinema, be expensive in london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(animation, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.91

Plausible(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(medium, is expensive)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(design, is expensive)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(cinema, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(photography, is expensive)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Typical(cinema, be expensive in london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(medium, is expensive)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Typical(design, is expensive)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.98

Typical(animation, is expensive) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)