animation: is expensive

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.61
, medium
Weight: 0.60
, industry
Weight: 0.58
, design
Weight: 0.57
Siblings shrek
Weight: 0.62
, photography
Weight: 0.33
, cinema
Weight: 0.33
, editing
Weight: 0.33
, comic
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is expensive 1.00
is damn expensive 0.84
be expensive in india 0.77
is attractive 0.76
be expensive in london 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(design, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(medium, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(medium, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(design, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(design, be expensive in india)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(feature, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(medium, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(design, is expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(design, be expensive in india)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(feature, is attractive)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(photography, is expensive)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(cinema, is expensive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cinema, be expensive in london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(design, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(medium, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(feature, is attractive)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(design, be expensive in india)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(animation, is expensive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(cinema, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(cinema, is expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(photography, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(photography, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cinema, be expensive in london)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cinema, be expensive in london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(animation, is expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(animation, is expensive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(medium, is expensive)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(design, is expensive)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(cinema, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photography, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(cinema, be expensive in london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(medium, is expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(design, is expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(design, be expensive in india)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(animation, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(feature, is attractive)