ant: be at forest

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings scorpion
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36
, cockroach
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at forest 1.00
be at in forest 0.99
be find in forest 0.96
be at woodland 0.82
be at tropical rainforest 0.79
be at it natural habitat 0.77
be at wilderness area away from person 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ant, be at forest)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(insect, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ant, be at forest)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ant, be at forest)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ant, be at forest)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(insect, be at in forest)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(creature, be at forest)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(animal, be at woodland)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at in forest)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(creature, be at forest)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(insect, be at in forest)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(animal, be at woodland)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(creature, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ant, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(insect, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ant, be at forest)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(animal, be at in forest)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ant, be at forest)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(animal, be at woodland)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(ant, be at forest)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(ant, be at forest)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)

Typical implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ant, be at forest)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(insect, be at in forest)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(insect, be at in forest)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(creature, be at forest)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(animal, be at in forest)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ant, be at forest)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(animal, be at woodland)