ant: be very strong

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, tool
Weight: 0.64
, organism
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.62
Siblings scorpion
Weight: 0.36
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, spider monkey
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36
, cockroach
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be very strong 1.00
has strong sense 0.86
be very important 0.81
be good 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ant, be very strong)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tool, be very important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ant, be very strong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(tool, be very important)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(animal, be good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(animal, be good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(tool, be very important)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(tool, be very important)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ant, be very strong)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(animal, be good)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(ant, be very strong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(ant, be very strong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ant, be very strong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(ant, be very strong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, be very important)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(animal, be good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(ant, be very strong)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, be very important)